
Granted, when most people think of going on a cruise, they don't think of fjords, pine trees, and water that's either too cold or too polluted to enter or fish from. However, that's unfortunate because in many ways the Baltic region is ideally suited to visiting by ship- and since (speaking with a fair background in
maritime law) there hasn't been a completely seaworthy cargo ship since the fall of Rome- I highly recommend booking a Baltic cruise.
The Baltic is, first of all, a beautiful part of the world and one that any would-be photographer shouldn't miss. Cities like Stockholm, Copenhagen, and Helsinki are almost dream-like. (And put paid to the idea that "socialist countries" are somehow inferior to anywhere else.) Rostock and Tallinn are fascinating glimpses into a world that was strictly verboten to Americans and Western Europeans for 50 years. And St. Petersburg is one of the world's great cities- and will get a post on this blog all its own fairly soon.
Having said that, let me quickly also say that cruising in the Baltic is very different from more traditional destinations like the Caribbean or Mediterranean. First off- and this is obvious, but should still be mentioned- the Baltic is not tropical. Yes, you are on a cruise ship with a Hawaiian/ Polynesia/ Caribbean theme luring you to the warm waters on every flight of stairs. But that harbor off the port side is Helsinki, not Havana. So scratch "banana boat ride" off your port itinerary and add "Nordic Walking" or "Canals and Waterways of St. Petersburg." A tour of the Hanseatic Brewery in Rostock includes a visit to a medieval church and monastery, not a beach chair like Barbados' Malibu Distillery. Seeing as most of the arranged excursions include a visit to a church or a palace, dress is slightly more "formal" than tropical destinations (and you probably want to bring a jacket along anyway). All of that leads to another phenomenon: the average age of passengers is probably 10 years older than elsewhere. The cruise lines are still working out how to effectively deal with this- the tried and true formula of a "kid's club" does not hold quite the same attraction for teenagers. And unlike in the Caribbean, the teens can't just lay around in the sun listening to their ipods.

The excursions many people have come to expect from cruise lines and their vendors- such as zip lines, speed boats, and jeep drives- have no equivalents in the Baltic. Cruise ship-organized excursions are most often geared precisely to the least-effort-humanly-possible mode of traveling- (and the Shore Excursion Staff will not likely inform more youthful passengers of this fact) creating TOURISTS out of would-be travelers. (One notable exception to this is Nordic Walking, especially available in Helsinki- essentially, this is cross country skiing without the skis over 7-9 miles of parks and pedestrian walking paths.) If you are not careful, "you will board your luxury motor coach for a scenic drive to..." Hell-sinki. Or
Crapenhagen. Or, worst of all, Shitholm. So the moral of the story is- except in St. Petersburg, where Russian officialdom will not let you leave the ship without a group or a previously arranged visa- plan to explore the Baltic capitals on your own. The ships (or local vendors) provide shuttles to and from the cruise docks to central locations in the cities and all of the major sites in Copenhagen, Helsinki, Stockholm, and Tallinn are within comfortable walking distances of each other.

The Baltic is also one place where choice of cruise line makes a huge difference. (Going to Nassau or Cozumel- the port facilities are the same no matter who you sail with, as are the excursions, souvenirs, and the crowds.) The size of the ship will determine whether it's docked next to Russian oligarchs' yachts- or the M/V Piece of Crap, flying the flag of that great maritime power, Bolivia. (However, the larger ships will give you a smoother ride. So there are tradeoffs.)
Perhaps most importantly, the various cruise lines market themselves- and tailor their services- to particular demographics. Holland America (owned by Carnival) and Celebrity (owned by Royal Caribbean International) strive to serve the needs of the elderly couples who grew up hearing tales of glamorous liner service between London and New York. (Of course, the elderly couples who grew up actually sailing on those liners still sail with Cunard.) Norwegian Cruise Lines (the company who invented modern cruising, and is now owned by an Asian conglomerate) focuses on more laid-back passengers and has no set dining times or assigned seating. Royal Caribbean bills itself as serving a younger crowd, with significant options for activity (so does Celebrity, but it is damn near impossible to avoid traveling on a luxury motor coach en route to any Celebrity-coordinated excursion). Carnival (and Costa)- sure, if you're looking for a week-long booze cruise, but for half the price of a Baltic cruise, you could just buy a case of vodka and save yourself the jet lag.
So which should you choose? Well, if you want adventure and young people- try Norwegian.
Want pampering, a fully-stocked library and a set schedule? Celebrity or Holland America is for you. Want your ship to be a destination itself? Royal Caribbean or Norwegian. Want to bring your young kids along? Book on Disney Cruise Lines and stay in the Bahamas, because anyone who does travel to the Baltic does not want to hear your kids running through the halls just as they've finally gotten to sleep during the 45-minute period of darkness during St. Petersburg's White Nights. (Thank you, this last bit has been a public service announcement.)Once you decide on a cruise line, you have a choice of somewhere between 12 and 36 classes of cabins. However, for almost all intents and purposes you really only have four choices of accommodations on any 2,000+ vessel: interior, exterior, balcony, and suite. Unless you are under 20 (or buying the cabin for someone who is) save your money and put it towards a more affordable vacation. (This goes double if your are trying to book a honeymoon.) Small, enclosed spaces- and the obvious lack of a window- greatly increase your chances of seasickness on board.
Exterior cabins are a great choice and probably the best value for the money (though if you are seriously contemplating shelling out for a suite, cost-effectiveness is probably not your chief concern), since they provide generally good views and smaller people can usually sit comfortably in the picture windows (my wife is 5'1" and has spent lots of time perched in these windows like a cat.)

Balcony cabins (or "staterooms" as they are aptly called at this level of comfort and expense) are fantastic options if they are within your budget and you would rather have some alone time- and almost always unobstructed views of the water/ scenery. On scenic cruises- and the Baltic fjords are certainly scenic- a balcony can make for an unforgettable trip. (I would hesitate to recommend one for some "scenic" cruises though- the Straights of Magellan/ Cape Horn in particular. While I have not experienced this myself, I cannot image the wind around the Horn makes for a pleasant afternoon tea on the terrace.)
Suites/Penthouses/Lofts- honestly, they are almost always beautiful and certainly provide more space, but if you intend to make much use of the public areas (lounges, bars, restaurants, pool deck, etc), I can't say they're worth the money. However, if (like one couple I know very well) buying a suite provides you with the sort of privacy and peace you rely on vacations to provide, then by all means- and enjoy the included concierge service.

